Skip to main content

Censorship or Pedophilia?

I believe in censorship. I made a fortune out of it.

Mae West

Recently I have come across articles from December 2010 that speak of Amazon and their censorship of certain materials. These materials include the erotica variety of certain incestual relationships. 

At the time this caused a big stir because it came right after Amazon, “believes it is censorship not to sell certain 
books simply because we or others believe their message is objectionable.” On their site they even had a statement stating something about respecting customers right to make their own purchasing decisions. The author's stament, “This is my attempt to make pedophile situations safer for those juveniles that find themselves involved in them, by establishing certain rules for these adults to follow. I hope to achieve this by appealing to the better nature of pedosexuals, with hope that their doing so will result in less hatred and perhaps liter sentences should they ever be caught.” This book in particular was a best seller so obviously it was making them a lot of money. 

In recent news, this is all coming back because Paypal is insisting that all people using their properties must remove content involving incest and all other such taboos such as beastiality.

People are in an uproar. One side says remove it because that is disgusting. Second side says you are sensoring individuals, they should be able to self publish whatever they wish. 

This is the true problem...I don't give a fuck who is being sensored in matters such as children. You put a guide up for molesters on how to "properly" behave while fondling, raping and damaging children then a big hairy guy in prison should "properly" show you how he inserts his giant penis in to your ass. There is no batter nature of a pedophile. Ok, so this makes me a little angry. The other thing that makes me angry, a person being able to make the statement, "I hate pedophelia, but I also hate CENSORSHIP. 

Fuck you man. This is also why I encourage the removal of incest relationships. I know that people like to imagine what they like to imagine, but this in my mind encourages another source/guide for people to harm children. As a matter of fact, I believe the same about the beastiality issue. Let goats, sheep and your loving dog go sleep in the corner while you pull yourself a bit. They don't need that. 

I do believe there is a line though, if it is not a guide encouragement to harming another being then leave it alone. For instance, vampires and wolves or whatever new crap is out should not be considered beastiality. If you mention two dogs going at it, that shouldn't be either. Please explain to me why we all love Lolita so much.

Sooooo, what do you think about this censorship issue? Where can the line be drawn on what is acceptable or not and who should be the one to judge?


Popular posts from this blog

Sutton Foster or Patti Lupone? Both.

"Broadway has been very good to me. But then, I've been very good to broadway."Ethel Merman

When I was 18 years old I went to my first Broadway show, the original broadway production of Mamma Mia. At the time Tina Maddigan was the lead and at the time I thought it was the greatest thing I had ever seen. Truthfully, I still have a special spot for that show and also for the lead. I don't know if this is true for everyone, but I don't see how anyone can truly forget their first show. My actual first show was watching Nutcracker in downtown Jacksonville. My teacher told me to watch for the tree and as it rose from it's spot it was spectacular. This means you will never forget your first show and you will never forget your first broadway spectacular. 

For those of you who liked the movie Mamma Mia (entire city of London), I thought it sucked. 

When I was 19 and I moved to New York, I was officially obsessed with going to the theatre. Usually, I only went to see cele…

Dear White People. Dear Humans. Another skinny white girl talking about racism in America...

Dear fellow white people: please stop using the reference "All Lives Matter". Also stop using the reference "white privilege". One is a defensive action, the other is white guilt trying to force white guilt. Both assume that you understand what it means to be a black citizen in this country. Both are responses to white guilt. I do not know the struggle, and I am not guilty just because I was born white. I've done nothing wrong, I will not apologize for something I had no control over. White privilege was never something I experienced, especially while I grew up in trailer parks...with other poor white people.

How about instead of indignation, we just all support the cause of Black Lives Matter? This will be your way of showing that all lives matter without saying it. When there is a peaceful protest, maybe you should join. There should be blacks, whites, cops, hispanics, everyone joining together. We don't have to be on any one side other than justice. Any p…

Mildred Pierce: Joan vs. Kate

Mildred Pierce was a book written in 1941. A book that was also made in to two separate movies. One in 1945 starring Joan Crawford and the other in 2011 starring Kate Winslet.

Just recently I have watched both films, mostly because I was tired of hearing how amazing Joan Crawford was and how Kate Winslet's version would never come close. After having watched both, I realize what I knew before, these people are really stupid. People who say this without proper knowledge of having seen Kate Winslet are just saying this because you must assume the older version is always better. They are making the assumption Kate Winslet can never compare to Joan Crawford because, well, because it is Joan Crawford and she won an Oscar for this role. I haven't seen any of the other movies that were performances of that category in 1945, but she does seem to have deserved it. 
I love both performances and I loved both film versions. I still like Kate Winslet's version as a whole. These are the…