Censorship or Pedophilia?

I believe in censorship. I made a fortune out of it.

Mae West

Recently I have come across articles from December 2010 that speak of Amazon and their censorship of certain materials. These materials include the erotica variety of certain incestual relationships. 

At the time this caused a big stir because it came right after Amazon, “believes it is censorship not to sell certain 

books simply because we or others believe their message is objectionable.” On their site they even had a statement stating something about respecting customers right to make their own purchasing decisions. The author's stament, “This is my attempt to make pedophile situations safer for those juveniles that find themselves involved in them, by establishing certain rules for these adults to follow. I hope to achieve this by appealing to the better nature of pedosexuals, with hope that their doing so will result in less hatred and perhaps liter sentences should they ever be caught.” This book in particular was a best seller so obviously it was making them a lot of money. 

In recent news, this is all coming back because Paypal is insisting that all people using their properties must remove content involving incest and all other such taboos such as beastiality.

People are in an uproar. One side says remove it because that is disgusting. Second side says you are sensoring individuals, they should be able to self publish whatever they wish. 

This is the true problem...I don't give a fuck who is being sensored in matters such as children. You put a guide up for molesters on how to "properly" behave while fondling, raping and damaging children then a big hairy guy in prison should "properly" show you how he inserts his giant penis in to your ass. There is no batter nature of a pedophile. Ok, so this makes me a little angry. The other thing that makes me angry, a person being able to make the statement, "I hate pedophelia, but I also hate CENSORSHIP. 


Fuck you man. This is also why I encourage the removal of incest relationships. I know that people like to imagine what they like to imagine, but this in my mind encourages another source/guide for people to harm children. As a matter of fact, I believe the same about the beastiality issue. Let goats, sheep and your loving dog go sleep in the corner while you pull yourself a bit. They don't need that. 

I do believe there is a line though, if it is not a guide encouragement to harming another being then leave it alone. For instance, vampires and wolves or whatever new crap is out should not be considered beastiality. If you mention two dogs going at it, that shouldn't be either. Please explain to me why we all love Lolita so much.

Sooooo, what do you think about this censorship issue? Where can the line be drawn on what is acceptable or not and who should be the one to judge?